egthareal
02-18-2005, 07:46 PM
In this world of infinate conspiricy theories I heard the all time greatest proposal of a poker conspiricy theory....
The other night at a home game poker tournament a friend proposed, "The WSOP is rigged, and I can prove it".
His theory revolved around the premise that several very important "gaming" companies, including MGM Grand/Mirage (soon to own Mandalay Bay) were visited by a group of marketers with a fail-safe idea of how to market pokers to the masses. These large "gaming" corperations then became heavily invested in the WSOP, merchandise and poker era mind set. Thier idea was to rig the televised WSOP event so that a seemingly regular everyday Joe Schmoe with relatively little poker expierence would win the tournament and spark incredible controversy. They repeated the same forumla in 2003 and in 2004.
My friend then presented his data for this theory which included some suprisingly accurate E*Trade financial reports indicating majority stock holders in publicly held WPT (as opposed to privately held WSOP) were some of the same players or competitors thereof who he suggested were involved in the marketing proposal years earlier.
Now - this could all just be a conspiricy theory. Or there could be some truth to it. WAS Poker destined to become mainstream? Or, was it forced the publics mainstream view?
Think about how ultra successful it has become - suggesting that its simply due to the fact of TV exposure is not necessarily true. Think if they put Bridge or any other strategic card game on TV would it have become this successful?
The other night at a home game poker tournament a friend proposed, "The WSOP is rigged, and I can prove it".
His theory revolved around the premise that several very important "gaming" companies, including MGM Grand/Mirage (soon to own Mandalay Bay) were visited by a group of marketers with a fail-safe idea of how to market pokers to the masses. These large "gaming" corperations then became heavily invested in the WSOP, merchandise and poker era mind set. Thier idea was to rig the televised WSOP event so that a seemingly regular everyday Joe Schmoe with relatively little poker expierence would win the tournament and spark incredible controversy. They repeated the same forumla in 2003 and in 2004.
My friend then presented his data for this theory which included some suprisingly accurate E*Trade financial reports indicating majority stock holders in publicly held WPT (as opposed to privately held WSOP) were some of the same players or competitors thereof who he suggested were involved in the marketing proposal years earlier.
Now - this could all just be a conspiricy theory. Or there could be some truth to it. WAS Poker destined to become mainstream? Or, was it forced the publics mainstream view?
Think about how ultra successful it has become - suggesting that its simply due to the fact of TV exposure is not necessarily true. Think if they put Bridge or any other strategic card game on TV would it have become this successful?